District Judge Jennifer Dorsey claimed Mayorga’s attorney had shown “bad-faith conduct” and the use of “purloined” confidential documents that tainted the case beyond redemption
A United States judge has dismissed a rape lawsuit claim from a Nevada woman against Cristiano Ronaldo in Las Vegas.
Kathryn Mayorga was bidding for the Manchester United footballer to pay her millions of dollars more than the £305k ($375k) in a confidentiality agreement she received after she claimed that he raped her in Las Vegas in 2009 – an allegation which Ronaldo has always denied.
U.S. District Judge Jennifer Dorsey dismissed the claim on Friday and ruled that Mayorga’s attorney, Leslie Mark Stovall, had shown “bad-faith conduct” and the use of “purloined” confidential documents that the judge said tainted the case beyond redemption.
Kathryn Mayorga accused Cristiano Ronaldo of raping her in 2009 ( Image: Getty)
Dorsey gave a 42-page order which dismissed the case outright with no option to file it again – saying this is a severe sanction while adding that Ronaldo had been harmed by Stovall’s conduct.
The ruling said: “I find that the procurement and continued use of these documents was bad faith, and simply disqualifying Stovall will not cure the prejudice to Ronaldo because the misappropriated documents and their confidential contents have been woven into the very fabric of (plaintiff Kathryn) Mayorga’s claims.”
It added: “Harsh sanctions are merited.”
Dorsey had followed the 2021 recommendations of U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel Albregts, who slammed Stovall’s conduct and reliance on the leaked and confidential documents.
“There is no possible way for this case to proceed where the court cannot tell what arguments and testimony are based on these [leaked] documents,” Albregts said in his report to Dorsey last October.
The allegation reached the public domain as a result of being reported by German newspaper Der Spiegel in 2017, as a result of their Football Leaks exposé, with documents revealing details of the case.
A document from the leaks alleges Ronaldo said “she said no and stop several times” during sex. He is also said to have apologised afterwards. His legal team have said the document was “completely fabricated” in an attempt to defame him.
Stovall could appeal Dorsey’s decision to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.
The Associated Press reported on Saturday that they have not responded to phone calls or text messages, to associate Larissa Drohobyczer, on the subject.
The accusation was levelled against Cristiano Ronaldo over a decade ago
Mayorga gave consent through Stovall and Drohobyczer for her name to be used publicly during the trial.
In 2019, US prosecutors said Ronaldo would not face any charges, nine years after Mayorga reportedly reached an out-of-court settlement with the Portuguese player.
Ms. Mayorga had sought to re-open the case in 2018 with her lawyer claiming that she had taken motivation from the #MeToo movement against sexual violence.
Ronaldo is alleged to have raped Mayorga, an American woman, during a holiday to Las Vegas in the summer of 2009, just weeks before his move from United to Real Madrid. He has always denied the allegation and has never been criminally charged over the claims.
On June 12, 2009, Ronaldo met Mayorga at the now-closed nightclub Rain, and they were pictured by paparazzi on that evening.
Mayorga has alleged that she was invited back to Ronaldo’s suite at the Palms Place Hotel, where it is alleged that the rape took place.
Kathryn Mayorga when she was a model in Las Vegas ( Image: Getty Images North America)
Ronaldo has been a football superstar across his near two-decade long career ( Image: Getty Images)
A day later, on June 13, 2009, Mayorga reported the alleged rape to police but refused to reveal the name of her alleged attacker or where the incident had taken place.
After hiring a lawyer Mayorga initiated civil proceedings against Ronaldo, but these have now been thrown out by the judge
Clark County District Attorney’s Office said in 2019 that it won’t prosecute the alleged attack.
They told TMZ that officers who attended the hotel on that day could not “conduct any meaningful investigation” because the woman refused to identify an attacker and would not say where she had been assaulted.
“Without knowing the identity of the perpetrator or the location of the crime, detectives were unable to search for and impound vital forensic evidence,’ the prosecutors said.