The president’s frantic tweets after the news broke of top Iranian nuclear scientist’s assassination make it clear his administration gave its blessing to the Tehran attack attributed to Israel. Could this be Trump’s final frenzy?
By Noa Landau
U.S. President Donald Trump has more than a month before he leaves the White House, and on his way out he could set the world on fire. In starting this conflagration, it seems as though he plans to strike every match in the box. Standing beside him, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would be more than happy to lend him a lighter.
The Friday assassination of the father of Iran’s nuclear program, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, projects a sense of end-of-season panic in Washington, but this time the last-minute fire sales take on a whole different meaning. Whoever it was who actually pulled the trigger, Trump’s frantic tweets afterwards leave no doubt that his administration gave its blessing.
All this, without even getting into the question of the level of coordination, or lack thereof, between the Israeli prime minister and his defense minister, Benny Gantz, over the operation, which comes at a time when tensions between the two are peaking. It was even claimed that Gantz had no knowledge of Netanyahu’s reported Saudi adventure. It’s hard to conceive such an insane scenario, in which a defense minister is being kept in the dark over supposed Israeli involvement in such an operation. But this will hardly be the only crazy thing to have happened during Trump’s presidency.
While the issue of Iran drives a massive wedge between Democrats and Republicans, and U.S. involvement in an assassination like this would be seen as a way to force the incoming president into a corner, in Israel it’s unlikely that anyone would dare to condemn the operation.
Israel and Iran have both fully bought into the Satan thesis, great or little. They continue to arm themselves, and with American help the neighboring Gulf states are being massively armed as well, all in an infinite cycle of escalation.
A significant escalation with Iran, at the height of a pandemic and suffering economy, with a prime minister facing trial and prone to excluding his defense and foreign ministers, is too terrifying a scenario.
As Netanyhau himself, as an opposition leader in 2008, said of then-Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, a prime minister up to his neck in legal issues has no moral or public mandate to determine such fateful things for the State of Israel, and the people in his circle, personally-appointed sycophants, are unable to temper the danger.